Sunday, February 9, 2014
Thoughts on "Shooting and Elephant"
So I'm a pretty big Orwell fan and was already kind of familiar with "Shooting and Elephant". It's very clear to see the political aspect of the short story (the whole ordeal with British Imperialism) but what I like the most is the idea of conformity. Is conformity the right word? I don't know but the point is that the narrator obviously has a problem over shooting the elephant. He knows he shouldn't shoot the elephant and that not shooting it will make him happy but if he doesn't he'll look like a coward or weak in front of the multitude. So should he kill it and feel bad to please the crowd or should he not kill it and look bad but still have some sense of happiness? Obviously he kills the elephant and then suffers by having to watch it slowly die in front of him. What this makes me think about is how much power and influence does the multitude have? And why does it have so much power? What I love the most is the animal Orwell decided to use. An elephant is gigantic and extremely strong but yet it's not as powerful as the crowd of people with judgement. The thought of judgement defeats a physically powerful beast.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWow Julio! You came up with ideas I never thought about. Thanks for sharing this post. It made me think more about what the author was really saying. This story could be Man vs. Self, Man vs. Nature. It is Man vs. Self because he is fighting with himself on whether or not he should do it and take the consequences. It's Man vs. Nature because he's harming the elephant's life in its own habitat.
ReplyDelete